<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>International Journal of Applied Operational Research</title>
<title_fa>ژورنال بین المللی پژوهش عملیاتی</title_fa>
<short_title>International Journal of Applied Operational Research - An Open Access Journal</short_title>
<subject>Basic Sciences</subject>
<web_url>http://ijorlu.lahijan.iau.ir</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>1</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>admin</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>2251-6867</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>2251-9432</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii>8</journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>7</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid>14</journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai>8888</journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science>13</journal_id_science>
<language>en</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1395</year>
	<month>6</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2016</year>
	<month>9</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>6</volume>
<number>3</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>fa</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa></title_fa>
	<title>Cross-efficiency evaluation by the use of ideal and anti-ideal virtual DMUs’ assessment in DEA</title>
	<subject_fa>عمومى</subject_fa>
	<subject>General</subject>
	<content_type_fa>پژوهشي</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Research</content_type>
	<abstract_fa></abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;p&gt;To rank Decision Making Units (DMU) in Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), the peer-evaluation based cross-efficiency method is generally used. Indeed, in this method, each DMU is evaluated from the view point of other DMUs. In this article, a method is suggested which instead examines each DMU just by using the weights resulting from the evaluation of ideal and anti-ideal virtual DMUs and thus exhibits a new secondary goal that possibly prevents the existence of multiple weights in cross-efficiency evaluation, in addition to introducing a new cross-efficiency score. The advantage of this method over the others is that it needs less computations in determining the cross-efficiency score. To this end, some examples are illustrated which show how it differs with other methods.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword></keyword>
	<start_page>69</start_page>
	<end_page>79</end_page>
	<web_url>http://ijorlu.lahijan.iau.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-12-1&amp;slc_lang=fa&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>S.H.</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>naseri</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>nasseri@umz.ac.ir</email>
	<code>1003194753284600721</code>
	<orcid>1003194753284600721</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Departement of Mathematics, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>H.</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Kiaei</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>1003194753284600722</code>
	<orcid>1003194753284600722</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Departement of Mathematics, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
